You've taken a thorough case history before. You know the questions to ask: previous injuries, surgical history, current medications, competition or working demands. You have a system, and it works well. Then a rescue animal walks through the door, and half the boxes on your intake form simply can't be filled in.
This is one of the more clinically interesting challenges in animal osteopathy — and one that isn't discussed anywhere near enough. Rescue animals, whether dogs, horses, or other species, present with histories that are incomplete by definition. The new owner may know a little. The rehoming organisation may know slightly more. But the first months, years, or even the formative developmental period of that animal's life? Often a blank.
That blank is not just an administrative inconvenience. It has real clinical implications for how you approach assessment, how you interpret findings, and how you frame your treatment goals. Understanding those implications makes you a more effective practitioner — not just for rescue patients, but for any animal whose lived experience cannot be neatly documented.
Why the Missing History Changes Everything
In a standard presentation, history guides hypothesis. You know the horse had a fall six months ago; that informs where you look and what you expect to find. You know the dog had TPLO surgery on the left stifle two years back; compensation patterns downstream and upstream of that joint make immediate clinical sense.
With a rescue patient, you lose that interpretive scaffold. What you find on assessment has to stand more independently — but it also has to be held more lightly. A compensatory pattern that would normally point clearly to a known incident instead becomes a question: is this structural adaptation? Chronic postural loading? A healed injury from years ago? A congenital asymmetry the animal has always lived with?
This doesn't mean assessment becomes less useful. It means the relationship between your findings and your conclusions becomes more nuanced. You move from detective work with a set of known clues to detective work where the scene has already been partially cleared. Your palpatory and observational skills matter more, not less.
Adapting the Intake Process
Before you even begin your physical assessment, your intake brief needs to flex. The standard form assumes retrospective certainty. With a rescue patient, you're building forward from whatever the new owner can tell you, which means reframing the questions you ask.
Rather than "previous injuries," consider asking the owner what they've noticed since the animal came into their care — changes in movement, posture preferences, reluctance in particular situations, reactions to touch in certain areas. This is prospective observational data, and it's genuinely valuable. A new owner who says "she always sleeps curled to the right" or "he flinches every time someone approaches from his left side" is giving you clinical information, even if they don't realise it.
It's also worth asking directly what the rehoming organisation observed. Rescue centres that work closely with animals pre-adoption often notice things that don't make it into formal documentation — a dog that won't lie on its left hip, a horse that was difficult to catch, a cat that startles unusually at noise. These behavioural fragments can complement your physical findings considerably.
Where the history is genuinely sparse, document that clearly. "History unknown prior to rehoming" is an honest and useful notation. It tells the next practitioner reading those notes something important about the interpretive context.
What Chronic Stress Does to the Body — and Why It Matters Here
One of the most significant clinical considerations with rescue animals is the physical sequela of prolonged psychological stress. This is not a soft or speculative concept. We know that chronic fear and anxiety states create consistent muscular and postural patterns — increased flexor tone, a drawn-in posture through the trunk, altered proprioception, and heightened reactivity to touch.
A rescue dog that spent an extended period in a kennel environment, or one that experienced neglect or mistreatment, may show lumbar restriction, reduced hip extension, and sensitivity over the posterior thoracic region that has nothing to do with a discrete musculoskeletal incident. It has everything to do with how that animal held itself, day after day, month after month, in response to its emotional state.
As we've explored in our article on the relationship between canine emotional state and physical presentation, the fear posture in dogs — lowered hind end, tucked pelvis, rounded lumbar spine — is not just a momentary behavioural response. When sustained, it reshapes the musculoskeletal system. Hip flexors shorten. Spinal extensors become inhibited and then reactive. The quadriceps, placed on chronic stretch, become exquisitely sensitive to palpation. Fryette's spinal laws apply whether the driving force is a physical incident or a sustained postural set.
Understanding this doesn't change the osteopathic techniques you use, but it changes how you interpret your findings and how realistically you frame the likely course of treatment. You're not resolving a single injury; you're working with an adaptive system that has been recalibrated over time.
The First Session: Calibrating Your Pace
With any new patient, the first session involves reading the room. With a rescue animal, this skill becomes particularly important. You may be encountering an animal that has learned to guard, dissociate during handling, or respond to manual contact in ways shaped by experiences you know nothing about.
Recognising the communication cues your patient gives you throughout the session is non-negotiable. An animal that goes very still and flat is not necessarily relaxed — it may have learned that compliance produces less aversion. An animal that escalates quickly from curiosity to withdrawal may have a lower tolerance threshold than a dog or horse that has experienced consistent, positive handling throughout its life.
In practical terms, this means slowing down. It means giving the animal more agency in the early stages of contact — allowing it to come to you, watching for micro-signals of acceptance or avoidance, and being genuinely willing to end a session early or work only at the level the animal can comfortably tolerate. The osteopathic work will be more effective because of this patience, not in spite of it.
This is also worth communicating clearly to the owner. If you're unable to complete a full assessment in the first session because the animal isn't ready, that's not a failure — it's good clinical judgement. Setting that expectation early builds trust with the owner and prevents them from interpreting a staged approach as uncertainty or incompetence on your part.
Treatment Goals: Thinking in Phases
With a rescue patient that has a layered and unknown history, it helps to think in treatment phases rather than aiming for a single-session resolution.
The first phase is principally assessment and rapport-building. You're gathering information about the animal's structural patterns, its tolerance of handling, and its responsiveness to gentle manual contact. You may do some light work in this phase — soft tissue, gentle articular assessment — but your primary output is a clearer clinical picture and the beginning of a working relationship with the animal.
The second phase, once the animal is more settled and you have a clearer hypothetical framework, involves working more directly with the patterns you've identified. This is where you begin to address compensatory loading, and restricted areas. Importantly, you'll want to progress slowly and monitor how the animal responds between sessions. Rescue animals can show pronounced post-treatment responses — sometimes positive, sometimes involving a temporary increase in sensitivity — and owners need to know what to watch for.
The third phase is maintenance and optimisation. By this point, you should have a reasonably good understanding of what the animal's structural baseline looks like, what patterns tend to return between sessions, and what environmental or management factors are contributing to their presentation.
Working Within the Wider Team
Rescue animals often come with a network of professionals already involved — vets, behaviourists, trainers, sometimes hydrotherapists or physiotherapists. Your role as an osteopath fits naturally into this framework, but it requires good communication in both directions.
Sharing your findings — translated thoughtfully into language that's useful to other practitioners — contributes to a more coherent approach to that animal's care. Receiving information from the behaviourist about how the animal is progressing socially, or from the vet about what imaging has shown, makes your osteopathic assessment more contextually informed.
It's also worth being explicit with the owner about what osteopathy can and can't offer in this context. You can work with physical patterns, support neuromuscular balance, and help the body adapt more comfortably as the animal's life circumstances improve. You are not, however, a substitute for veterinary assessment, and in rescue animals with genuinely unknown histories, don't hesitate to recommend imaging or further investigation — when the history is blank, a lower bar for referral is simply good clinical practice
Adapting Your Brief, Not Your Standards
Adjusting your brief does not mean lowering your clinical standards. It means recognising that the tools you use need to be applied with more flexibility, more interpretive humility, and more willingness to hold your hypotheses loosely until the picture becomes clearer.
Rescue animals are, in many ways, among the most rewarding patients in clinical practice. They often respond profoundly to skilled, patient manual work. The combination of structural unloading and genuine positive handling can produce changes that extend well beyond the physical — and watching that happen across a course of treatment is one of the more compelling arguments for this work.
Understanding how to approach these patients well is part of what separates a competent osteopathic practitioner from a truly skilled one. The blank spaces in the history are not a problem to solve before you begin. They are part of the clinical reality you work within — and they are navigable, if you know how to read what the body in front of you is telling you.
.png)
.png)
